for the product “essentially

for the product “essentially” is the same, therefore, genetically modified foods compared with conventional food monitoring online button bailey method “essentially the same also. The United States testing method of genetically modified food, do as President bush said, and the traditional natural food testing means no difference. Write here, I again remind of an old topic, about food in the prior detection problem toxic substance.mbt footwear  Assume that, once the genetically modified food really appeared harm, not people questioned the U.S. government, why not prior detection? This kind of situation had actually appeared. Germany has a university graduate farmers, for genetically modified new technology is yearning, he bought a genetically modified crop seeds, the company provide fodder for his cows. As a result, his 70 bull cows all dead. The German college students farmers gm seeds company sales a court that the farmer, the company wanted his other causes of the consequences. Thanks to the German college students peasants have culture, he retained complete breeding diary, peddled had to make compensation. A Russian scientists did an experiment, the small mice into contrast groups, a group non-gm soy, a group of edible normal soybeans and a group of eating the soybean other normal food. The results found that mice non-gm soy, the existing weight obviously deficiencies, obviously bad heart development, etc. But, this kind of negative reports about gm products in the United States government and big capital tall sale fashion  under the collaboration, was banned, people generally can’t see. In Europe to genetically modified food frequent public protests, also the harsh crackdown on by the police, and are described as “green terrorists” or communism “monstrous sons” act.

mbt footwear We already know the U.S. government for genetically modified foods, that is: the answer genetically modified (gm) food and natural food “substantially identical”. So, jumped out of the food is harmful this problem, whether in intellectual property rights, and people there comes naturally to doubt: since “substantially identical”, why can obtain patent protection? A few years ago, a biotechnology company Texas applied for a rice patents. The rice is generations of people growing Indian somewhere rice variety, the Texas doesn’t have this kind of rice planting the natural conditions. mbt footwear So, why it can obtain the U.S. patent? The U.S. government’s explanation is, because after a genetically modified (even if little), this kind of genetically modified rice with traditional Indian rice has been essentially have sale online cheap difference, mbt footwear so, granted the patent is legal. We found that americans paradoxes yet? Granted, it said the patent “essentially have distinction”,